-
26th January 2004, 04:15 AM
#1
The new guy needs advice.
Howdy all.
It's always a little wierd to be starting a new thread in a foreighn forum, so I hope you'll all cut me some slack if there is another thread that answers this. I thought it'd be best if I didn't dig out a dead thread.
At any rate, for a while I trained in a local combined martial arts (no weapons) dojo till I was a brown belt and then fell out of the habit. I'll probably be getting back into the same dojo sometime soon, but I've always been interested in Japanese blades, both period peices and newly smithed ones.
Moving along. Since I discovered what constituted a true katana, I've wanted one. Until recently, that hasn't been a very achievable desire. However with a decent income, I'm now in the market for one. Maybe later down the road I'll start training in kendo, but for now, I'd settle for owning a decent blade.
I've been looking on ebay for quite some time now, and decided that one of the higher-end Hanwei blades would fit the bill. I've narrowed it down to either the Orchid or the Tiger. I've heard some good things about these swords but when making a purchase of over 800 bucks, I thougth it would be prudent to get as many opinions as possible.
My ultimate question is such as follows: How does one of Paul Chen's folded hanwei blades compare to a decent Shinto peice, or failing that, a proffessionally smithed modern katana? If anyone that owns or has worked with these blades could give me some input, I'd be much obliged.
-
26th January 2004, 04:22 AM
#2
I don't know much about swords, but I do own 2 of my own. the cheaper one I have is of stainless-steel and scratches easily. the other is of carbon-steel and doesnt scratch easily, but tarnishes if you dont care for it properly. The carbon-steel one was about $200, but the ken is a reverse bladed one. The one that scratches was $100. Well, this was just a thought for you. I'm not sure if it will help much. ^^x' sorry if I was just a nueicense.
-
26th January 2004, 04:34 AM
#3